📐 CQE Quest › Learn

Gage R&R explained (with a worked example)

Short answer: a gage R&R study tells you how much of the variation you see is coming from the measurement system and not from the parts. If the gage is noisy, you can't tell good parts from bad ones, and your control charts and capability numbers can't be trusted.

How a typical study runs

Pick about 10 parts that cover the real process range. Have 2 or 3 operators measure each part 2 or 3 times, in random order, without seeing earlier readings. Then analyze the data with the ANOVA method (preferred, because it also gives the operator × part interaction) or the average-and-range method.

Worked example

The ANOVA gives these standard deviations: repeatability 0.030 mm, reproducibility 0.020 mm, part-to-part 0.150 mm. The tolerance is 1.0 mm wide.

σ GRR = √(0.030² + 0.020²) = 0.0361 σ total = √(GRR² + 0.150²) = 0.1543 %GRR (of total variation) = 0.0361 / 0.1543 = 23.4% %GRR (of tolerance) = 6 × 0.0361 / 1.0 = 21.6% ndc = 1.41 × (0.150 / 0.0361) = 5.87 → 5

What it means: by the common rule of thumb (under 10% good, 10–30% may be acceptable depending on the application, over 30% unacceptable) this gage is marginal. With ndc = 5 it can separate parts into enough groups for process control (5 or more is the usual target). Repeatability is the bigger piece, so look at the gage itself first: fixturing, resolution, cleanliness, wear. If reproducibility were bigger, you'd look at training and method.

Common exam traps

Test yourself in 2 minutes

Try 5 free CQE practice questions, including a calculation problem with fresh numbers. Every wrong answer comes with an explanation. No account needed.

Take the free CQE quiz

More: 5 Whys · 8D problem solving · AOQ & AOQL · APQP & PPAP · AQL sampling plans · Attribute agreement & kappa · Attribute control charts · Availability & maintainability · Benchmarking types · Binomial vs Poisson · Blocking & randomization · Calibration & traceability · Capability: non-normal · Chi-square test · Confidence intervals · Control chart selection · Control plan · CA effectiveness · Cost of quality · Cp vs Cpk vs Cpm · Cpk vs Ppk · CQE exam day tips · CQE study plan · CQE vs CQA vs CSSBB · Is the CQE worth it? · CUSUM & EWMA · Design reviews · Design V&V · Destructive testing · DFMEA vs PFMEA · Document control · Fault tree analysis · First article inspection · Fishbone diagram · FMEA: RPN vs AP · Full vs fractional factorial · Gage R&R · GD&T basics · Hazard vs risk vs harm · Hypothesis test selection · I-MR chart · Interaction plots · ISO 14971 · ISO 9001 clauses · Kaizen event planning · Kano model · Lean wastes (TIMWOODS) · Linear regression · Management review · MRB dispositions · MSA: bias, linearity & stability · NCR, CAPA & PA · Nonparametric tests · Normal distribution & z-table · One-way ANOVA · p-value explained · Pareto chart · PDCA vs DMAIC · Poka-yoke · QFD / House of Quality · Quality audits · Quality mgmt principles · Quality manual vs procedures · Quality plan vs control plan · Redundancy: parallel & standby · Reliability allocation · Bathtub curve & MTBF · Response surface methods · Risk-based thinking · Risk matrix vs FMEA · 7 mgmt & planning tools · Short-run SPC · Six Sigma certifications · Sigma level & DPMO · Six Sigma DMAIC · Supplier quality scorecards · Switching rules (sampling) · Taguchi loss function · Theory of constraints · Tolerance stackup · Traceability & lot control · Type I vs II error · Value stream mapping · Variables vs attributes · Weibull analysis · Western Electric rules · X-bar R vs X-bar S · CQE calculators · Study planner · Section quiz

CQE Quest by Bizarre Act. Original study material; not affiliated with ASQ. CQE is a certification of ASQ. Terms · Privacy