Fault tree analysis (FTA)
Fault tree analysis is a top-down, deductive reliability technique. You start with an undesired top event (system failure) and work downward, asking what combinations of lower-level events could cause it. Logic gates connect the events: an OR gate fires when any input fails; an AND gate fires only when all inputs fail simultaneously.
Gate probability rules
Worked example
System fails (top event) if either the control subsystem OR the actuator subsystem fails.
- Control subsystem fails (AND gate): Component A (P = 0.05) AND Component B (P = 0.02) must both fail.
- Actuator subsystem fails (OR gate): Component C (P = 0.03) OR Component D (P = 0.01) fails.
Interpretation: the system fails with probability 4.07% (about 1 in 25). The actuator OR gate (P = 4.0%) dominates. Improving Component C or D is the highest-leverage action.
Minimal cut sets
A minimal cut set is the smallest combination of component failures that causes the top event. In this example the cut sets are: {A, B} and {C} and {D}. Single-component cut sets ({C}, {D}) are the most critical because a single failure can bring the system down.
Common exam traps
- OR gates increase system unreliability; AND gates reduce it. Adding redundancy (parallel paths = AND logic for all to fail) improves reliability. Series systems use OR logic for failures.
- FTA assumes binary (failed or working) states. Partial failure and degraded modes require extensions like the multi-state FTA or a FMEA with severity gradations.
- FTA is deductive (top-down); FMEA is inductive (bottom-up). FTA asks “what could cause this failure?” FMEA asks “what could go wrong with this component?”
Try 5 free CQE practice questions on this exact topic. Every wrong answer comes with an explanation. No account needed.
Take the free CQE quizMore: 5 Whys · 8D problem solving · AOQ & AOQL · APQP & PPAP · AQL sampling plans · Attribute agreement & kappa · Attribute control charts · Availability & maintainability · Benchmarking types · Binomial vs Poisson · Blocking & randomization · Calibration & traceability · Capability: non-normal · Chi-square test · Confidence intervals · Control chart selection · Control plan · CA effectiveness · Cost of quality · Cp vs Cpk vs Cpm · Cpk vs Ppk · CQE exam day tips · CQE study plan · CQE vs CQA vs CSSBB · Is the CQE worth it? · CUSUM & EWMA · Design reviews · Design V&V · Destructive testing · DFMEA vs PFMEA · Document control · Fault tree analysis · First article inspection · Fishbone diagram · FMEA: RPN vs AP · Full vs fractional factorial · Gage R&R · GD&T basics · Hazard vs risk vs harm · Hypothesis test selection · I-MR chart · Interaction plots · ISO 14971 · ISO 9001 clauses · Kaizen event planning · Kano model · Lean wastes (TIMWOODS) · Linear regression · Management review · MRB dispositions · MSA: bias, linearity & stability · NCR, CAPA & PA · Nonparametric tests · Normal distribution & z-table · One-way ANOVA · p-value explained · Pareto chart · PDCA vs DMAIC · Poka-yoke · QFD / House of Quality · Quality audits · Quality mgmt principles · Quality manual vs procedures · Quality plan vs control plan · Redundancy: parallel & standby · Reliability allocation · Bathtub curve & MTBF · Response surface methods · Risk-based thinking · Risk matrix vs FMEA · 7 mgmt & planning tools · Short-run SPC · Six Sigma certifications · Sigma level & DPMO · Six Sigma DMAIC · Supplier quality scorecards · Switching rules (sampling) · Taguchi loss function · Theory of constraints · Tolerance stackup · Traceability & lot control · Type I vs II error · Value stream mapping · Variables vs attributes · Weibull analysis · Western Electric rules · X-bar R vs X-bar S · CQE calculators · Study planner · Section quiz
CQE Quest by Bizarre Act. Original study material; not affiliated with ASQ. CQE is a certification of ASQ. Terms · Privacy