Binomial vs Poisson distribution
Both distributions model counts of discrete events. Choosing the wrong one on the CQE exam costs you the answer even if your arithmetic is perfect.
| Binomial | Poisson | |
|---|---|---|
| What you count | Defective units in a sample of n | Defects (events) per unit, area, or time |
| Fixed n? | Yes—sample size is fixed | No fixed n; n is effectively very large |
| p (probability) | Fixed and known for each trial | Small; λ = np is what you use |
| P(X=k) | C(n,k) × pᵏ × (1−p)ⁿ⁻ᵏ | e⁻λ × λᵏ / k! |
| Mean | np | λ |
| Variance | np(1−p) | λ |
Use Poisson as an approximation to the binomial when n ≥ 20 and p ≤ 0.05 (or n ≥ 100 and p ≤ 0.10). Set λ = np.
Worked example 1 — Binomial
A process has 5% defective parts. A sample of n = 10 is drawn. Find P(X = 0) and P(X ≥ 1).
Worked example 2 — Poisson
Surface defects occur at a rate of λ = 3 per panel. Find P(X = 0) and P(X = 2).
Practice problem
A 200-square-metre roll of fabric has an average of 0.5 blemishes per square metre. What is the probability of zero blemishes in a 1 m² section? (λ = 0.5)
Show answer
P(X=0) = e⁻⁰·⁵ = 0.6065. About 61% of sections will be blemish-free.
Common exam traps
- “Defective units” vs “defects per unit.” Counting which units fail = binomial. Counting how many scratches are on a unit = Poisson.
- Poisson requires independence. Defects must occur independently at a constant average rate. Clustered defects (one scratch causes another) violate this assumption.
- np for the Poisson approximation must be small. The approximation is poor when p is large (e.g., 20% defective). Stick with the exact binomial formula in that case.
Try 5 free CQE practice questions on this exact topic. Every wrong answer comes with an explanation. No account needed.
Take the free CQE quizMore: 5 Whys · 8D problem solving · AOQ & AOQL · APQP & PPAP · AQL sampling plans · Attribute agreement & kappa · Attribute control charts · Availability & maintainability · Benchmarking types · Binomial vs Poisson · Blocking & randomization · Calibration & traceability · Capability: non-normal · Chi-square test · Confidence intervals · Control chart selection · Control plan · CA effectiveness · Cost of quality · Cp vs Cpk vs Cpm · Cpk vs Ppk · CQE exam day tips · CQE study plan · CQE vs CQA vs CSSBB · Is the CQE worth it? · CUSUM & EWMA · Design reviews · Design V&V · Destructive testing · DFMEA vs PFMEA · Document control · Fault tree analysis · First article inspection · Fishbone diagram · FMEA: RPN vs AP · Full vs fractional factorial · Gage R&R · GD&T basics · Hazard vs risk vs harm · Hypothesis test selection · I-MR chart · Interaction plots · ISO 14971 · ISO 9001 clauses · Kaizen event planning · Kano model · Lean wastes (TIMWOODS) · Linear regression · Management review · MRB dispositions · MSA: bias, linearity & stability · NCR, CAPA & PA · Nonparametric tests · Normal distribution & z-table · One-way ANOVA · p-value explained · Pareto chart · PDCA vs DMAIC · Poka-yoke · QFD / House of Quality · Quality audits · Quality mgmt principles · Quality manual vs procedures · Quality plan vs control plan · Redundancy: parallel & standby · Reliability allocation · Bathtub curve & MTBF · Response surface methods · Risk-based thinking · Risk matrix vs FMEA · 7 mgmt & planning tools · Short-run SPC · Six Sigma certifications · Sigma level & DPMO · Six Sigma DMAIC · Supplier quality scorecards · Switching rules (sampling) · Taguchi loss function · Theory of constraints · Tolerance stackup · Traceability & lot control · Type I vs II error · Value stream mapping · Variables vs attributes · Weibull analysis · Western Electric rules · X-bar R vs X-bar S · CQE calculators · Study planner · Section quiz
CQE Quest by Bizarre Act. Original study material; not affiliated with ASQ. CQE is a certification of ASQ. Terms · Privacy