Process capability in DMAIC: baseline vs entitlement
In the Measure phase, you calculate the baseline capability — the current performance of the process as it actually runs. This becomes the "before" number you will compare against your Improve-phase results. See the CQE pages on Cp vs Cpk vs Cpm → and Sigma level & DPMO → for the underlying math. This page focuses on the DMAIC framing.
Baseline vs entitlement
Two capability benchmarks matter in a CSSBB project:
- Baseline capability: Current long-term performance, measured over enough time to capture all sources of variation (shift changes, raw material lots, equipment warm-up). Use Ppk (long-term index), not Cpk, for the baseline.
- Entitlement: The best short-term performance the process has already demonstrated — what the process is capable of when everything goes right. Measured with Cpk on a short, stable run under ideal conditions. Entitlement is a practical ceiling for what the current process can achieve without fundamental redesign or capital investment.
Baseline Sigma level
The DMAIC project goal is often stated as a Sigma level increase, not just a capability-index target. The long-term Z (distance from the mean to the nearest spec limit in long-term σ units) is ZLT = 3 × Ppk. By the Six Sigma convention, the reported (short-term) Sigma level adds the 1.5σ shift: Sigma level = ZLT + 1.5. So "Six Sigma" means ZLT = 4.5, which gives 3.4 DPMO (one-sided normal tail).
| Sigma level (reported, with 1.5σ shift) | ZLT | Ppk ≈ ZLT/3 | DPMO |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3σ | 1.5 | 0.50 | 66,807 |
| 4σ | 2.5 | 0.83 | 6,210 |
| 5σ | 3.5 | 1.17 | 233 |
| 6σ | 4.5 | 1.50 | 3.4 |
A short-term Cpk of 2.00 (ZST = 6) corresponds to a 6σ process; after the assumed 1.5σ long-term shift it performs like Ppk = 1.50. The 1.5σ shift is a convention, not a law — state it when you report a Sigma level.
What if the process is not normally distributed?
Use transformation (Box-Cox, Johnson) or non-normal capability indices (Cnpk based on percentiles). See Capability: non-normal →
Measure tollgate: capability checklist
- MSA acceptable per AIAG MSA (4th ed.) guidelines: %GRR under 10% acceptable, 10–30% may be acceptable depending on the application, over 30% unacceptable; ndc ≥ 5
- Data collected over a representative time period (all shifts, multiple lots)
- Normality tested (histogram, Anderson-Darling or Shapiro-Wilk)
- Baseline Ppk (or attribute defect rate) documented
- Baseline Sigma level calculated
- Entitlement documented (best observed short-term performance)
Try 5 free CSSBB practice questions on process capability in DMAIC.
Take the free CSSBB diagnosticMore: DMAIC overview · Project charter · VOC & CTQ · SIPOC · MSA in DMAIC · Process capability · Data collection planning · Graphical analysis · Root cause analysis · Multi-vari analysis · Hypothesis testing · Regression · DOE · FMEA · Define tollgate · Change management · Financial benefits · Team dynamics · Improve tollgate · Piloting & scaling · Poka-yoke (BB) · Solution selection · Control plan · SPC in DMAIC · Sustaining gains
CSSBB Quest by Bizarre Act. Original study material; not affiliated with ASQ. CSSBB is a certification of ASQ. Terms · Privacy