Section IX — Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) ~4%
DFSS is the smallest section of the 2022 Body of Knowledge, about 6 of the 150 scored questions. DMAIC improves a process that already exists; DFSS designs a new product, service or process so it meets customer needs from the start. Questions test which framework fits which situation and what the main design tools do.
DMAIC or DFSS?
| Situation | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| An existing process misses its targets and the cause is unknown | DMAIC | There is a baseline to measure and a cause to find |
| A new product, service or process is being designed | DFSS | There is no baseline; quality has to be designed in |
| An existing process has been improved repeatedly and still can't meet the requirement | DFSS (redesign) | The current design has hit its entitlement; incremental fixes won't close the gap |
DFSS roadmaps
- DMADV: Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify. The most common roadmap. Measure here means measuring customer needs and turning them into CTQs, not measuring an existing process.
- DMADOV: DMADV with an Optimize step before Verify, to tune design parameters (for example with designed experiments or tolerance design).
- IDOV: Identify, Design, Optimize, Validate (some sources say Verify). An alternative roadmap you may see in other references; the BoK focuses on DMADV and DMADOV.
Exam trap: the last step verifies or validates the design against customer requirements, usually through pilots and prototypes. It is not a control plan for a running process.
Core DFSS tools
The BoK’s DFSS section centers on the DMADV/DMADOV roadmaps, design for X and robust design. QFD, TRIZ and Pugh concept selection are standard companion tools; QFD is also the main way VOC is translated into requirements in Define.
- QFD (house of quality): translates customer needs (the "whats") into technical requirements (the "hows"), with a relationship matrix, importance ratings and a correlation "roof" between requirements.
- Design for X (DFX): designing for a chosen life-cycle goal, such as manufacturability and assembly (DFM/DFA), reliability, serviceability, testability, cost or the environment.
- Robust design: choosing design parameters so performance is insensitive to noise (variation you can't or won't control). Taguchi's parameter design and signal-to-noise ratios are the classic approach.
- TRIZ: a theory of inventive problem solving built from patterns in patents; it resolves technical contradictions (improving one parameter worsens another) with inventive principles.
- Pugh concept selection: scores alternative concepts against a datum concept on each criterion (+, −, S) to pick and combine the strongest ideas.
Try the free 25-question CSSBB diagnostic: questions across all 9 BoK sections, with an explanation for every answer and a score by section.
Take the free CSSBB diagnosticAll CSSBB sections
CSSBB Quest by Bizarre Act. Original study material; not affiliated with ASQ. CSSBB is a certification of ASQ. Terms · Privacy