🏭 CSSGB Quest › Learn

Fishbone diagram & 5 Whys

Root cause analysis in the Analyze phase has two key tools: the fishbone diagram (also called Ishikawa or cause-and-effect diagram) for structured brainstorming of potential causes, and 5 Whys for drilling down from a symptom to its underlying root cause. Neither tool proves causation — that requires data. They generate hypotheses to test.

The fishbone diagram: 6M categories

The effect (problem) is written at the head of the fish. Six major cause categories form the bones:

CategoryWhat goes hereExample for fill weight issue
Man (People)Operator skill, training, attention, fatigueOperator not following fill weight check frequency; variable technique
Machine (Equipment)Gage accuracy, maintenance, wear, settingsFill nozzle wear; scale calibration drift; auger speed variation
Method (Process)Procedure, work instruction, test methodSOP doesn’t specify warm-up checks; no defined tare procedure
MaterialRaw materials, components, supplier variationBulk density variation in Examplorphine API lot; bottle weight variation
MeasurementGage R&R, calibration, measurement methodHigh %GRR on in-process scale; wrong measurement point in process
Mother Nature (Environment)Temperature, humidity, vibration, dustTemperature variation affects tablet flow rate; vibration from nearby equipment

How to run a fishbone session

  1. Write the problem statement on the right (the "head"). Be specific: "Fill weight on Line 2 exceeds 255 mg, occurring on ~8% of bottles."
  2. Draw six major bones and label with the 6M categories.
  3. Brainstorm causes for each category without judgment. Each cause is a "rib" off the main bone; sub-causes are smaller ribs.
  4. Look for causes that appear in multiple categories — they are worth a closer look.
  5. Circle or dot-vote the top 3–5 most likely causes to investigate with data.

5 Whys technique

Start with the problem statement and ask "Why?" repeatedly until you reach a root cause that, if fixed, would prevent recurrence. Five iterations is a guideline, not a rule.

Worked example: Examplorphine fill weight high

Problem: Fill weight on Line 2 averages 251.5 mg, target 250.0 mg.

Why 1: Why is the fill weight high?
Because the auger is dispensing more powder than set.

Why 2: Why is the auger dispensing more than set?
Because the auger speed control module was replaced last month and re-calibrated to an old spec.

Why 3: Why was it calibrated to an old spec?
Because the maintenance team used a paper SOP, not the current electronic version.

Why 4: Why was the current electronic version not used?
Because maintenance technicians have been printing SOPs and there is no control preventing use of outdated paper copies.

Root cause: The document control system does not prevent use of obsolete paper SOP copies for maintenance tasks.

Corrective action: Move maintenance calibration SOPs to electronic-only; add a step in the maintenance work order requiring the technician to confirm the current revision number before performing work.

5 Whys best practices

Common exam traps

Test yourself

The free 20-question CSSGB diagnostic covers all six Body of Knowledge sections, with an explanation for every answer.

Take the free CSSGB diagnostic

More: Pareto analysis · Hypothesis testing · SIPOC · Solution selection · DMAIC overview

CSSGB Quest by Bizarre Act. Original study material; not affiliated with ASQ. CSSGB is a certification of ASQ. Terms · Privacy